In larger commercial real estate leases, the tenant occasionally needs a loan to build the premises or finance major transactions. The tenant does not own the real property, but has the lease, which is both an interest in real property and a contract. This results in two sets of rights…
California Real Estate Lawyers Blog
Multiple Deeds of Trust, Recorded on the Same Day, May not Have Priority in the Order Which They are Indexed. A Warning for Foreclosure Sale Buyers.
It is common in a real estate transaction to have more than one loan providing the purchase money. In the residential situation, it usually involves the first mortgage and a second home equity line of credit (HELOC) for a lesser amount. The HELOC is a usually required if the buyer…
A Nominal Buyer of Real Estate Had a Contract With the real Owner – Why This Owner Could Not Rescind the Contract, But Was Entitled to Damages
People buy real estate in California through nominal or “straw” buyers for many reasons. Sometimes to hide assets, or to launder money. Maybe it’s for legitimate reasons. Nonetheless, California real estate attorneys usually encounter these situations where the agreement between the parties is oral, and there is no documentation. But…
A Fake Deed of Trust and a Fraudulent Transfer – When the Fraud May Be Sucessful
When a loan is secured by real property in California, a deed of trust is recorded, acting as a lien on the property. This reduces the equity in the property. If the owner defaults on the loan, the beneficiary (lender) may then conduct a trustee’s sale. But what if the…
Settlement Agreements & Judgments – Provisions to Encourage Performance Without Being Found to be Unenforceable
A settlement agreement resulting in entry of a judgment results in a ‘stipulated’ or ‘consent’ judgment, which is not appealable. However, settlement agreements often include provisions for future enforcement – such as penalties, fines, and injunctive relief. But once a judgment is entered the trial court loses jurisdiction to consider…
Stipulating to a Large Judgment for Failure to Perform a Settlement Agreement – Why It Can be an Unenforceable Penalty
In my prior post, I discussed a decision concerning a settlement that had had a large penalty for failing to make payments. The court found that it was an unenforceable illegal penalty, and not a legitimate liquidated damages provision. Liquidated damages are damages whose amount the parties agree during the…
Liquidated Damages Provisions – When is it an Unenforceable Penalty?
Liquidated damages provisions in California Business and Real Estate contracts are an attempt to establish ahead of time what the damages for breach would be. Rather than have to prove to a judge what the damages are, the parties agree to what they would be. There are specific statutory restrictions…
Failure to Disclose – In California Real Estate, the Seller’s Expert Must Deal With The Buyer To Be Considered Seller’s Agent; Otherwise, Their Knowledge Will Not be Attributed to the Seller
In California real estate sales, a typical claim by disgruntled buyers is that the seller failed to disclose some problem with the property that the seller was aware of. The buyer’s cry is that, if the facts had been disclosed, they would have not bought the property, or would have…
Adverse Possession: A Situation In Which a Fence and Locked Gate Did Not Provide Notice of Hostile Use
Adverse possession is a way of acquiring title to real property through continuous possession or use for a specified period of time. One of the elements required to prove adverse possession is that the possession or use must be “hostile to the owner’s title.” This does not mean that there…
Reverse Veil Piercing in California – Available to Expose LLC Assets to Liability
Piercing the corporate veil, (the alter ego doctrine) is a procedure which creditors use when their judgment is against a corporation or LLC which is owned by, or controlled by, a sole shareholder. Usually, the corporation has no assets to collect from, and the goal of the creditor is to…