Close

California Real Estate Lawyers Blog

Updated:

California Duty to Disclose and concealment – where a bank’s memo did not create a duty

Generally, in California to prove a claim for fraud and deceit based on concealment, the plaintiff must prove five elements: (1) the defendant must have concealed or suppressed a material fact, (2) the defendant must have been under a duty to disclose the fact to the plaintiff, (3) the defendant…

Updated:

California deed of trust – failure to name the trustee in the deed of trust does not prevent foreclosure

A deed of trust represents security for the loan. It has several parties- a) the trustor, who is the borrower and owner of record for the real property that is security for the loan; b) the beneficiary, who is the lender whose debt is secured by the deed of trust;…

Updated:

Acceleration Clause in California promissory note -Requires the creditor to exercise the clause.

An acceleration clause in a loan document or promissory note is a provision that requires the entire amount of the unpaid principal and interest to become due when the specified event occurs. There are two kinds. First, in a typical Promissory Note, the entire amount may become due in the…

Updated:

Cutting Down A Tree On A Property Line in California – Damages and Why A Neighbor Should Think Twice Before Running a Saw

In California, a tree growing on a property line is considered a “line tree,” and the owners on both sides have rights and responsibilities. The Civil Code states that they own the tree in common. (Civil Code section 834) As a result, neither owner is free to cut down the…

Updated:

Lenders on California real estate may owe duties to their borrowers -Part 2: Lenders who cannot produce or authenticate documents don’t have evidence in California Courts

Last post I discussed the decision in Scott Call Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, Inc., where there were ongoing disputes between the borrower and lender, and the lender made many representations that they would likely agree to a loan modification. The court concluded a duty may have been created that…

Updated:

Lenders on California real estate may owe duties to their borrowers -Part 1: Statement of Opinions can sometimes be relied on.

California law has had a persistent rule that, when it comes to real estate loans, a lender does not own a borrower any duties beyond those expressed in the loan agreement, except those imposed due to special circumstances. Courts rarely find those special circumstances, and hold lenders and buyers to…

Updated:

California Prescriptive Easements – When The Owner Gives You Permission to Use the Property, You Cannot Make a Claim For Establishing an Easement.

California prescriptive easements arise when someone uses someone else’s property without permission; its almost that simple. The idea is that, if the use is open, and continues for five years, the true owner of the property has time, and an obligation, to take action to stop the unwelcome use, which…

Updated:

California Commercial landlords have two new disclosure requirements in 2013- Energy Use, and whether the property meets accessability standards

California landlords are faced with a myriad of regulatory requirements for disclosures as well as enforcement of their leases. Two new mandatory disclosures for commercial leases will be required in 2013- past energy use of the building, and whether the premises have been inspected by a “certified access specialist”, and…

Updated:

Sacramento Kings Partnership Agreement allows Partners to Match the Deal for Sale of a Partnership Interest.

I had written last week about the right of first refusal common in partnership agreements, and how it may affect the sale of a majority interest in the Sacramento Kings to a Seattle Group. If you are involved in a partnership agreement contemplating a sale of an interest, you should…

Updated:

California equitable easements created when hardship worse for the user, and the plaintiff is a jerk.

California equitable easements are created by courts when, balancing the conveniences of the parties and considering the relative hardships between them, the court refuses to prohibit a nuisance or encroachment. This is the same result, though a slightly different analysis, that an implied easement. Anyone faced with a problem use,…

Contact Us