Close

Articles Posted in real estate law

Updated:

California Court Rules That Once Default Judgment has Existed for Over Two Years, It Cannot Be set aside Unless the Proof of Service Is Void On It’s Face

To set aside a default judgment in California, either the judgment must be void on its face, or the motion brought within two years of entry. In a recent case the motion was filed more then two years after the judgment was entered. The trial court found that the evidence…

Updated:

Another Erroneous California Arbitration Award is Binding, thanks to the CAR Form

Buyers bought a home in Southern California using the standard CAR purchase agreement, in which they initialed the requirement to arbitrate any disputes. Before they moved into the home, they learned it had extensive structural damage which was not disclosed. The buyers sued their broker, claiming that they knew about…

Updated:

What Is the Difference Between a Grant Deed and a Quitclaim Deed? The assumption is often made that a “Grant” deed is better than a Quitclaim. Here is the Reason Why.

Under California law, a Grant Deed contains two implied covenants- these are promises that are not written into the deed itself. In deed language, the “grantor” is the person or entity who grants the property and signs the deed; the “grantee” is the one who receives the interest in the…

Updated:

Offering Homeowners a Loan is Not A Representation that the Homeowners can Afford the Loan- a California court reminds Borrowers that Lenders Usually Do Not Owe Borrowers a Duty of Care.

Homeowners in Discovery Bay, California, sought in 2007 to refinance their mortgage through GMAC. They provided the loan officer will accurate income information. It turned out, however, that the loan application prepared for them had a fabricated, inflated income. They were not given the application to review. They could not…

Updated:

An Attorney Cannot Agree to a California Arbitration on Behalf of the Client, But the Client Can Game the System If He Does (and the client loses the Arbitration)

In a recent case a husband and wife sold property to plaintiffs, who sued for misrepresentation. (There was no indication in the court’s opinion whether they had used a C.A.R. contract and initialed the arbitration provision.) Both parties attorneys and the judge signed a stipulation and order for arbitration and…

Updated:

A Real Estate Sales Contract becomes an Option Enforceable Due To Performance

A developer-buyer entered an agreement with a landowner to buy 10 acres after buyer pursued county approval for subdivision. The contract contained a contingency that the buyer was not obligated to do anything and could cancel the contract at any time. The buyer pursued the subdivision, spending money for engineering…

Updated:

Avoiding Usury- if a Lender Takes A Small Interest in the Real Estate Project, He Is A Joint Venturer / Partner and Can Avoid the Usury Laws Against High Interest Loans

Usury is the charging of interest for a loan in excess of the legal maximum. In California, the amount is set out in the state Constitution. Exemptions to the law are also described in the Constitution, as well as court decisions. One the of court-established exceptions is for a joint…

Updated:

Loan Guarantor’s Own Real Estate Attached On Default- Guaranties Are Risky

Chang guaranteed three construction loans, totaling 4 million dollars, for another party. In the guarantees Chang waived the right to require the Bank to proceed first against the borrower, or foreclose against the borrower’s property. The other party defaulted, and the bank went after Chang first, filing a lawsuit and…

Updated:

California Escrow Co. in trouble -When escrow has closed and the seller then changes instructions for distribution of the money, escrow cannot always carry them out.

California Escrow Co. in trouble -When escrow has closed and the seller then changes instructions for distribution of the money, escrow cannot always carry them out. A million dollar property in Northridge was under contract for sale. The buyer’s side was handled by Peregrino, the buyer’s “attorney in fact.” The…

Updated:

The foreclosing lender’s promise was not a binding contract, but was binding anyway- the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel.

A lender was foreclosing on a house in Southern California, and the owner was arranging financing to avoid foreclosure. They were down to the wire, and the owner’s broker was in contact with the foreclosure officer. The foreclosure sale had been postponed to August 30, but they needed more time.…

Contact Us