Outside reverse veil piercing differs from traditional veil piercing, which is permitted due to the “‘The alter ego doctrine prevents individuals or other corporations from misusing the corporate laws by the device of a sham corporate entity. Traditional veil-piercing permits a party to pierce the corporate or limited liability company…
Articles Posted in damages
Unjust Enrichment & Restitution in California – Privity of Contract is not Required
Generally, one who is unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution. The law has created this remedy d to restore the aggrieved party to his or her former position by the return of the thing or its equivalent in money. However, if the benefits are…
A California Interference with Contract Claim requires a Stranger to the Contract to Interfere – But the Stranger May Have an Economic Interest in the Contract
California recognizes a cause of action against noncontracting parties who interfere with the performance of a contract. If you and I have a contract, and John Doe (not part of our contract) tells you that I’m a bum and will never be able to perform the contract, and convinces you…
A Nominal Buyer of Real Estate Had a Contract With the real Owner – Why This Owner Could Not Rescind the Contract, But Was Entitled to Damages
People buy real estate in California through nominal or “straw” buyers for many reasons. Sometimes to hide assets, or to launder money. Maybe it’s for legitimate reasons. Nonetheless, California real estate attorneys usually encounter these situations where the agreement between the parties is oral, and there is no documentation. But…
Stipulating to a Large Judgment for Failure to Perform a Settlement Agreement – Why It Can be an Unenforceable Penalty
In my prior post, I discussed a decision concerning a settlement that had had a large penalty for failing to make payments. The court found that it was an unenforceable illegal penalty, and not a legitimate liquidated damages provision. Liquidated damages are damages whose amount the parties agree during the…
Liquidated Damages Provisions – When is it an Unenforceable Penalty?
Liquidated damages provisions in California Business and Real Estate contracts are an attempt to establish ahead of time what the damages for breach would be. Rather than have to prove to a judge what the damages are, the parties agree to what they would be. There are specific statutory restrictions…
Harming California Trees Can Result in Treble Damages for Replacement, PLUS Treble The Amount Awarded for Annoyance – Blunderers and Rogues Beware!
California law takes trees seriously and provides enhanced damages when someone harms them. There is provision for doubling the damages incurred for harm caused to timber, trees, and underwood, and trebling it if the harm is intentional. (Civil Code section 3346.) Another provision allows doubling the damages for harm to…
When Equitable Indemnity Does Not Apply – the Economic Loss Rule
In California, equitable indemnity applies when there are two wrongdoers (‘tortfeasors’) who are both jointly and severally liable for harm to someone. They are entitled to have their liability split between them based on their comparable fault. Joint and several liability can apply to acts that are concurrent or successive…
Adding additional judgment debtors to California Money Judgments.
Often a party to a lawsuit will have great success at trial, resulting in a money judgment. Then the judgment holder tries to collect the judgment, and finds that the debtor is judgment – proof, has no assets, or files bankruptcy to avoid liability for that judgment. Sacramento business attorneys…
Non – Refundable Deposits in California real estate contracts – not valid in rising market; The Alternative!
Standard in most form real estate contracts are provisions for liquidated damages. Not so common is the non-refundable deposit. A “liquidated damages” provision stipulates an estimate of what the damages would be in the event of a breach of a contract. It is generally valid, unless it can be shown…