Contracts related to real estate transactions often have arbitration provisions included, requiring the parties to submit their disputes to an arbitrator rather than the court. Some standard forms, such as the CAR forms, have optional arbitration provisions that apply if accepted by all parties. Commercial Brokerages often require binding arbitration…
Articles Posted in arbitration
Judicial Reference Better than Arbitration In California – But the reason the court can refuse to order reference
Judicial reference, unlike arbitration, works within the court system. A lawsuit is filed, and the judge appoints a referee to assist in the case, or decide it on their own. Parties can agree, in their contracts, that disputes are to be determined by a general judicial reference. This means the…
General reference of California disputes – How you can avoid a courthouse trial without having to deal with unpredictable arbitration
Parties can provide in their contracts that any dispute be resolved by “general reference.” A general reference directs a referee to try all issues in the action. The hearing is conducted under the rules of evidence applicable to judicial proceedings. In a general reference, the referee prepares a statement of…
California Construction Contracts and Arbitration – When the Issue is whether the contractor was unlicensed, Courts Can Throw Away the Arbitrator’s Decision.
I have written several times about the finality of Arbitration decisions, and haw they cannot be overturned even if the Arbitrator did not follow the law, or ignored the facts. Also discussed here has been the plight of the unlicensed contractor, and how he is not entitled to be paid,…
California Motion To Compel Arbitration Granted If There Could Possibly Be Inconsistent Rulings. Judicial Admissions Work Both Ways, Not Just One Way.
California real estate transactions usually have provisions requiring that the parties arbitrate any dispute, rather than file a lawsuit. Sometimes they file suit anyway, and an opponent in the real estate contract dispute makes a motion to the court to order the parties to arbitrate, rather than litigate. The Code…
California Judge would not force parties to arbitrate real estate concealment claim against seller Nick Cage, though Purchase Agreement had arbitration provision- buyer included Construction defect claim against builder
Update at Bottom Most California residential real estate contracts (such as the C.A.R. form) have an arbitration provision providing for optional binding arbitration. If the parties all initial it, it becomes a requirement of contract. In arbitration the parties agree to have a supposedly unbiased third person decide the dispute.…
California arbitrator makes a mistake, plaintiff’s $1.6 million arbitration judgment is worthless. More evidence of the risks of arbitration
I have written before about binding, erroneous arbitration awards and how arbitration awards are unappealable. I’ve also written about whether the trustee or the trustee is the party, the issue that disappointed a recent plaintiff. This plaintiff, Portico Management Group, entered a real estate purchase contract to buy an apartment…
When A Developer of California Condominium Project Cannot Enforce CC&R’s -What Developer & Owners Need To Know
A California court recently ruled that a Developer of a condominium project, who was sued for construction defects by the homeowner’s association, could not force the association into arbitration. Promenade at Playa Vista Homeowners Association v. Western Pacific Housing, Inc. Cal . Court of Appeal, Second District, No. B225086. This…
Developer Cannot Enforce Arbitration Provision in California CC&Rs
A condominium developer in Southern California got sued by the Association for construction defects. The developer filed a motion to compel arbitration under the provisions of the CC&Rs. The court said no! Recorded CC&Rs are made binding in disputes between owners, or owners and the association, because of their shared…
Another Erroneous California Arbitration Award is Binding, thanks to the CAR Form
Buyers bought a home in Southern California using the standard CAR purchase agreement, in which they initialed the requirement to arbitrate any disputes. Before they moved into the home, they learned it had extensive structural damage which was not disclosed. The buyers sued their broker, claiming that they knew about…